현장안전 브리핑FIELD SAFETY BRIEFING
검색
← Case studies

Can overfill protection work when the gauge stops?: The Buncefield oil depot explosion

Explosions and a major fire occurred at Buncefield, United Kingdom, on 11 December 2005. The case highlights both normal level measurement and independent overfill protection.

Fuel continued to arrive while indication stopped

The HSE/EA report describes a stuck gauge on Tank 912 and failure of the independent high-level protection to prevent overfilling. Overflow generated a vapor cloud followed by explosions and fire.

HSE and Environment Agency: Buncefield — Why did it happen?

Smoke from the Buncefield fire, photographed from Dunsmore on 11 December 2005. Peter Dean / Public domain.
Smoke from the Buncefield fire, photographed from Dunsmore on 11 December 2005. Peter Dean / Public domain. · Source photograph
Can overfill protection work when the gauge stops?: The Buncefield oil depot explosion — Safety Kim educational illustration
AI educational illustration · Not an actual incident photograph or a verified installation.

Two displays are not necessarily two barriers

Distinguish normal measurement from the overfill-protection function. Shared sensing, power or signal paths can expose apparently separate devices to the same failure.

Trace the complete path from sensing through decision and alarm to final isolation. Required independence and reliability should follow the actual risk assessment and competent engineering design.

HSE and Environment Agency: Buncefield — Why did it happen?

Damaged tanks on 28 January 2007, about 13 months after the fire. Rob Emms / Geograph / CC BY-SA 2.0.
Damaged tanks on 28 January 2007, about 13 months after the fire. Rob Emms / Geograph / CC BY-SA 2.0. · Source photograph

Check your workplace

  • Have common failure paths between measurement and protection been assessed?
  • Are bypass removal and normal restoration verified after tests?
  • Is there sufficient margin for detection and isolation at maximum inflow?

Verify restoration after testing

An HSE safety alert addressed the test mechanism and restoration of particular level switches. A successful test record does not alone demonstrate that protection remains available in service.

Include test conditions, outputs, final-element action, bypass removal, restoration and handover. Apply the actual manufacturer’s instructions; do not generalize the mechanism of the product discussed in the alert.

HSE safety alert HID 6-2010: Level switches on large tanks

Consider the time remaining before overflow

Review available capacity, maximum inflow and detection-to-isolation time together. Include continued inflow after shutdown where relevant.

A changed route, receipt rate or receiving tank needs reassessment. Containment and drainage controls are important but cannot replace overfill prevention.

HSE: Buncefield investigation

Putting it into practice

Before receipt, match the tank, route and permitted quantity with protection-system test and restoration records. If level indication freezes or the material balance becomes inconsistent, use the approved stop procedure rather than continuing blindly.

Korean safety resources

Sources