Field Safety BriefingFIELD SAFETY BRIEFING
Search

Serious accident cases

English names and summaries of Korean laws are unofficial translations. The Korean text on the Korean Law Information Center (law.go.kr) prevails.

Entering to clear a blocked pipe?: asphyxiation in a slurry pit

Published Updated
Key terms in Korean and English

At a glance

On 4 September 2023, 1 worker clearing a blocked manure pipe died inside a slurry pit at a pig farm in North Jeolla Province.

The worker was poisoned by hydrogen sulphide.

An open access hatch above a slurry pit
Incident reconstruction · An open access hatch above a slurry pit — Not a photograph of the incident · Details of layout and actions may differ from the actual scene · Source: Ministry of Employment and Labor / KOSHA, Serious Accident Whitepaper 2024, pp. 300–309 · Whitepaper (Korean)

From preparation to the aftermath

On 2023-09-04, a worker died inside a slurry pit while clearing a manure transfer pipe at a pig farm. Manure passed from the animal buildings through collection pits to storage and treatment equipment. A rope running through the pipe was pulled or shaken to loosen hardened manure.

Video recorded the worker pulling the rope at an opening at about 14:10. The worker moved to another pit after the first attempt failed, then entered when the blockage remained. A task performed from outside had changed into entry work.

At about 17:00, the manager noticed the worker was missing. After asking colleagues and reviewing video, the manager found the worker in the pit. Entry and the accident had occurred without continuous observation from outside.

Death was caused by hydrogen sulphide poisoning. A later test under conditions similar to those on the accident day exceeded the instrument limit of 200ppm. This was not a measurement of the worker’s personal exposure at the moment of the accident.

An open hatch does not establish safe air

Decomposition and stagnant conditions affect the atmosphere where manure accumulates. Disturbing or walking through manure can release hydrogen sulphide held within it. Clearing a blockage changes not only the flow path but also the conditions for gas release.

The hatch normally remained closed and was opened infrequently for blockages. Opening it admits light and outside air, but does not establish adequate exchange throughout the pit. A visible opening does not make the space fit for entry.

Arrange testing from outside rather than sending someone in to investigate. Consider the bottom, pipe connections and other places where gas can accumulate, and monitor changes when manure is disturbed. A single reading does not establish conditions for the remainder of the task.

The openings had no barriers preventing entry, and no detector had been provided because the work was infrequent. Infrequently opened spaces need an established outside-cleaning method, stopping point and means of obtaining assistance before a blockage occurs.

If clearing a blocked pipe turns into entry into the pit, stop the original task and apply a planned entry procedure.

Define retesting and stop points for changes in method, and maintain contact through an outside attendant. Verify that ventilation actually reaches the work position, not merely that a fan is running.

Filtering respirators cannot protect breathing in oxygen-deficient spaces or spaces with high concentrations of hazardous gases. These conditions require an airline respirator or self-contained breathing apparatus. If someone in a pit becomes unresponsive, prevent an impulsive entry through the same opening. Call for rescue, control access and keep the approach clear for trained rescuers. Changing a filter mask is not a substitute for appropriate supplied-air rescue equipment.

Consider a method that avoids entry: external inspection or disconnection of the blocked pipe, or specialist emptying and cleaning. Reachability is not a reason to send a person inside. Review the maintenance method and isolate connected pumps and pipes to prevent unexpected inflow.

What the comparison shows

In the same whitepaper, workers undertaking drainage work in a limestone mine were exposed to carbon monoxide in workings where blasting occurred. A person who later checked the scene found a ventilation fan switched off. The gases had different sources, but both cases concerned failure to establish continuing safe air where people worked.

Disturbing pit contents can release gas; other operations and ventilation equipment affect air in mine workings. A reading at the entrance or a statement that another task has finished is insufficient. Testing and ventilation checks must address the actual work position before and throughout entry.

Causes and protective layers

LayerAt the timeWorkplace action
Outside clearanceEntry followed unsuccessful rope clearanceStop and obtain specialist assistance if outside clearance fails
AtmosphereEntry without gas testingPlan gas selection, test locations, ventilation and continuing monitoring together
Entry and rescueNo system continuously watched the workProvide entry control, an outside attendant and means of requesting rescue

Investigation and proceedings

The MOEL white paper describes entry into the slurry pit and hydrogen sulphide exposure, without reporting subsequent investigation, enforcement or court outcomes.

Why the consequences were severe

Colleagues noticed the absence only near the end of the working day. Nobody outside could immediately recognise that a person had collapsed inside. An attendant must be able to maintain contact, recognise abnormal conditions and summon rescue, as well as account for entrants.

Unprotected entry to reach a collapsed colleague can create further casualties. Raise the alarm and control access, with rescue undertaken using the necessary breathing protection and equipment. Apparent proximity to the casualty does not remove those requirements.

Safety Kim explains testing and ventilation equipment from outside a barriered pit

Questions at the work position

QuestionWhat to examine
Where does unsuccessful rope work stop?A defined stop and assistance request before changing to entry
How does the attendant maintain contact?A position and means to check responses and call rescue
Is testing continued after manure is disturbed?Atmospheric changes and ventilation as stagnant material is moved

Korean legal references

Current Rules Articles 619, 620 and 623 address the confined-space programme, ventilation, and outside observation and communication. Assigning clearance work requires identifying the actual space and whether entry is involved, not merely naming the equipment.

Rescue equipment under Article 625 and emergency rescue training under Article 640 also require preparation. These references guide current work planning; they do not state an enforcement outcome for this accident.

Occupational Safety and Health Act (Korean) · Rules on Occupational Safety and Health Standards (Korean)

Field practitioner note

Sources

MOEL and KOSHA, 2024 Serious Accident White Paper, 296–329 pages. Official publication (Korean)